A Duncan Phyfe Empire table (New Orleans Auctions, 2007), complete with winged figures, carved columns, gilding and paw feet.
The image is taken from: http://rarevictorian.com/2009/06/empire-furniture-isnt-always-empire-furniture.html
Beauty & Utility
In The Grammar of Ornament (1856) Owen Jones argued that, “Construction should be decorated. Decoration should never be purposely constructed.” In my opinion it means that the design object should first of all be useful and not over decorated. The ornament or any other type of decoration should not interrupt the structure. It should be just a supportive element, not a separate independent object. The first picture shows an example of “decoration constructed”. The angel-shape harps are elements of the table structure. Used instead of normal legs they don’t let the table top fall down. As well as paw feet.
Personally I support Owen Jones’ idea and I think it’s right, but I cannot fully agree with his statement. In that design argument I would sit on the fence. I do agree that design is not only about aesthetics, but also about functionality. On one hand things are constructed in such way that they look beautiful but their beauty damages their functionality that makes them useless and inconvenient. According to Jones (1856), Pugin was convinced that that kind of random unsystematic decoration, appeared as the result of greed and self-interest. On the other hand design is all about creativity and cannot be bounded by such strict rules. Sometimes decoration should be closely intertwined with construction, otherwise it will not implement the idea of the author.
References: Jones O., 1856, Design,Society, and Standarts
References: Jones O., 1856, Design,Society, and Standarts



